Engineering tools for bots

Not sure where to begin? Start with Which tool, when. It's the quickest way into every tool on this page.

Engineers and managers built a toolbox over the last hundred years. FMEA. Pareto charts. Control plans. 5 Whys. Plan-Do-Check-Act.

They work. They are also slow and a little tedious for a person. Filling in forty rows of a risk table takes an afternoon.

A bot fills those forty rows in a minute or two. And the tool gives the bot what it needs most: a structure to think through the problem, a way to rank what matters, and a reason to stop before it drowns in detail.

That is our view, anyway, and this series is the case for it. None of the tools are new. That's the point.

Start with Old tools, new workers for the idea behind the series.

Planning tools

Risk tools

Problem-solving tools

Improvement systems

Machine safety

Factories learned to keep people safe around powerful machines. A lot of it carries over to powerful software.

How this fits with Tools for bots

This page covers the engineering methods. Tools for bots is the umbrella hub: the management tools, like principles, records, document control and review, that these methods sit inside. A management system asks you to address risk, control production and fix causes. It doesn't say which methods to use. These are the usual ones.

Where bots differ

The tools assume the worker is a person who gets tired and bored. A bot doesn't. That's the advantage.

But the tools also assume the person filling them in knows the product and has seen the factory floor. A bot hasn't. It can fill a risk table with plausible rows that don't belong to your product. Every page in this series comes back to the same rule: the bot does the groundwork, a person checks it against reality and decides.