| Project | Product revision | Sheet revision | Prepared by | Date | Target market / jurisdiction | Decision being prepared | Sheet | Lead | Item ID | Question | Evidence to record | Answer / assumption | Explanation | Status | Evidence / exact revision / URL and date | Owner | Next action | Reviewer / review date | Not-applicable reason | Source guidance URLs |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Basic | C1 | 1 | Sample preparation utility | 2026-10-24 | U.S. adults; Wisconsin illustrative base | Next private feasibility gate | New product development: the project review | b-project-manager | PROJECT-01 | Who will use it, who pays, and what problem is worth solving? | Name the user, buyer, task, alternatives and evidence from actual conversations. Separate founder beliefs from observations. | Adult homeowners are users/buyers; manual checking and reluctance to kill are unvalidated needs | Scenario proposal; no observations or approvals inferred. Adult homeowners are users/buyers; manual checking and reluctance to kill are unvalidated needs | estimate — unvalidated | data/products/basic/; concept C1; no external evidence | Sam Reed | Collect the evidence requested in this question before its dependent gate; target 2026-12-15 | Not reviewed — no review date | Applicable planning question; any unchosen route is explicitly described in answer | nist-development; sba |
| Basic | C1 | 1 | Sample preparation utility | 2026-10-24 | U.S. adults; Wisconsin illustrative base | Next private feasibility gate | New product development: the project review | b-project-manager | PROJECT-02 | What are we making, and what is outside the first version? | Concept revision, intended use, must-have outcomes, exclusions and measurable success criteria where known. | Basic C1: Standard mechanical catch-and-release trap for one mouse; manual checks and manual release. No disease-control claims; no child use; no export launch | Scenario proposal; no observations or approvals inferred. Basic C1: Standard mechanical catch-and-release trap for one mouse; manual checks and manual release. No disease-control claims; no child use; no export launch | estimate — unvalidated | data/products/basic/; concept C1; no external evidence | Sam Reed | Collect the evidence requested in this question before its dependent gate; target 2026-12-15 | Not reviewed — no review date | Applicable planning question; any unchosen route is explicitly described in answer | nist-development; sba |
| Basic | C1 | 1 | Sample preparation utility | 2026-10-24 | U.S. adults; Wisconsin illustrative base | Next private feasibility gate | New product development: the project review | b-project-manager | PROJECT-03 | How many might we sell, at what price, through which channel and by when? | Low/base/high units by month or quarter, geography and channel. Show prospects × purchase rate × units or stores × units per store per week × weeks. Record assumptions and capacity limits; market size is not a sales forecast. | Annual low/base/high 1500/3000/6000 units are cost sensitivities; target $24; website then 5 hardware stores then Amazon; drone commercial forecast 0 | Scenario proposal; no observations or approvals inferred. Annual low/base/high 1500/3000/6000 units are cost sensitivities; target $24; website then 5 hardware stores then Amazon; drone commercial forecast 0 | estimate — unvalidated | data/products/basic/; concept C1; no external evidence | Sam Reed | Collect the evidence requested in this question before its dependent gate; target 2026-12-15 | Not reviewed — no review date | Applicable planning question; any unchosen route is explicitly described in answer | nist-development; sba |
| Basic | C1 | 1 | Sample preparation utility | 2026-10-24 | U.S. adults; Wisconsin illustrative base | Next private feasibility gate | New product development: the project review | b-project-manager | PROJECT-04 | What evidence says someone will buy it? | Dated interviews, observed problems, price tests, pilots, orders or other evidence. Distinguish interest, nonbinding intent, paid orders and repeat sales. | No interviews, price tests, orders or repeat customers; market-evidence is an explicit none record | Scenario proposal; no observations or approvals inferred. No interviews, price tests, orders or repeat customers; market-evidence is an explicit none record | estimate — unvalidated | data/products/basic/; concept C1; no external evidence | Sam Reed | Collect the evidence requested in this question before its dependent gate; target 2026-12-15 | Not reviewed — no review date | Applicable planning question; any unchosen route is explicitly described in answer | nist-development; sba |
| Basic | C1 | 1 | Sample preparation utility | 2026-10-24 | U.S. adults; Wisconsin illustrative base | Next private feasibility gate | New product development: the project review | b-project-manager | PROJECT-05 | What must be learned before the next investment? | Open customer, IP, safety, technical, cost and channel risks; one next experiment, owner, finish condition and capped budget. | Prove Capture door and ventilation with surrogates before tooling; cap next feasibility work at $15000 | Scenario proposal; no observations or approvals inferred. Prove Capture door and ventilation with surrogates before tooling; cap next feasibility work at $15000 | estimate — unvalidated | data/products/basic/; concept C1; no external evidence | Sam Reed | Collect the evidence requested in this question before its dependent gate; target 2026-12-15 | Not reviewed — no review date | Applicable planning question; any unchosen route is explicitly described in answer | nist-development; sba |
| Basic | C1 | 1 | Sample preparation utility | 2026-10-24 | U.S. adults; Wisconsin illustrative base | Next private feasibility gate | New product development: the project review | b-project-manager | PROJECT-06 | What are the milestones and dependencies? | Concept review → feasibility and economics → prototype/user evidence → production readiness → launch → post-launch review. Tailor the sequence; do not imply every gate is already passed. | G0 concept → G1 mechanism → G2 user/welfare → G3 freeze → G4 pilot → G5 launch; no gate has real sign-off | Scenario proposal; no observations or approvals inferred. G0 concept → G1 mechanism → G2 user/welfare → G3 freeze → G4 pilot → G5 launch; no gate has real sign-off | estimate — unvalidated | data/products/basic/; concept C1; no external evidence | Sam Reed | Collect the evidence requested in this question before its dependent gate; target 2026-12-15 | Not reviewed — no review date | Applicable planning question; any unchosen route is explicitly described in answer | nist-development; sba |
| Basic | C1 | 1 | Sample preparation utility | 2026-10-24 | U.S. adults; Wisconsin illustrative base | Next private feasibility gate | New product development: the project review | b-project-manager | PROJECT-07 | Who owns each result and decision? | Named responsible people/assistants, exact inputs and revisions, agreed review participants and dates only when agreed. | Alex Meadow owns budgets; Sam Reed owns technical evidence; independent specialists review safety; no real appointments | Scenario proposal; no observations or approvals inferred. Alex Meadow owns budgets; Sam Reed owns technical evidence; independent specialists review safety; no real appointments | estimate — unvalidated | data/products/basic/; concept C1; no external evidence | Sam Reed | Collect the evidence requested in this question before its dependent gate; target 2026-12-15 | Not reviewed — no review date | Applicable planning question; any unchosen route is explicitly described in answer | nist-development; sba |
| Basic | C1 | 1 | Sample preparation utility | 2026-10-24 | U.S. adults; Wisconsin illustrative base | Next private feasibility gate | New product development: the project review | b-project-manager | PROJECT-08 | Should we go, revise, hold or stop? | Evidence reviewed, decision author/date, unresolved conditions, authorized next work and links to the exact released files. Revisit downstream sheets when an input changes. | Recommend private feasibility only; hold tooling and launch until critical tests, welfare and regulatory questions close | Scenario proposal; no observations or approvals inferred. Recommend private feasibility only; hold tooling and launch until critical tests, welfare and regulatory questions close | estimate — unvalidated | data/products/basic/; concept C1; no external evidence | Sam Reed | Collect the evidence requested in this question before its dependent gate; target 2026-12-15 | Not reviewed — no review date | Applicable planning question; any unchosen route is explicitly described in answer | nist-development; sba |
Sample — fictitious company. All numbers and people are invented scenario assumptions. This is draft concept paperwork; no physical testing, customer evidence, certification, filing or sign-off has occurred.