| Project | Plan ID / revision | Test ID | Requirement / CTQ / risk IDs | Purpose / decision | Stage | Method / edition / clause | Acceptance criteria / source | Sample IDs / count / rationale | Configuration / revisions / prototype differences | Prior history / conditioning | Fixture / equipment / calibration | Operating modes / environment | Levels / units / tolerances / rationale | Sequence / duration / repetitions | Baseline / during / postchecks | Safety / stop / restart rules | Operator / lab scope | Budget / schedule | Readiness / reviewer | Actual run date | Actual results / units | Outcome / deviations | Evidence / report revision | Corrective action / retest | Result reviewer / date |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Basic | TP-C1 | T01 | R01 / CTQ01 / DF01 | Verify Capture door before next gate | concept feasibility | Internal proposed method: Cycle rig then 5 N outward retention pull | Door remains latched in 100 dry capture cycles on each of 10 concept units; scenario C1 not approved | 10 mechanical prototypes or one simulated system across listed fault cases; screening sample, not certification | Basic C1; prototype uses surrogates and isolated rigs; no released hardware | Baseline clean/dry; repeat dirty/worn condition where relevant | Force gauge/temperature logger/video or HIL harness; calibration before use | Indoor controlled bench; flight simulation only; representative misuse injected | Criterion above is proposed; numerical limits require qualified engineering/welfare review | Per described method; log every cycle/fault and state transition | Baseline function; monitor safety states; final containment/visual check | Stop on distress surrogate failure, unexpected motion, heat or interlock defeat; specialist authorizes restart | Sam Reed; independent specialist for hazardous tests | Included in $15000 feasibility allowance; internal target 2026-12-15 | Not ready — design/safety review first | Not run | No actual results | Not run; no pass or deviation claimed | No report exists | If fail: redesign Capture door and repeat linked tests | Not reviewed |
| Basic | TP-C1 | T02 | R02 / CTQ02 / DF02 | Verify Ventilation ribs before next gate | concept feasibility | Internal proposed method: Occlude either vent bank with paper surrogate; inspect remaining airflow path | At least two independent raised vent paths remain unobstructed in bedding surrogate trial; scenario C1 not approved | 10 mechanical prototypes or one simulated system across listed fault cases; screening sample, not certification | Basic C1; prototype uses surrogates and isolated rigs; no released hardware | Baseline clean/dry; repeat dirty/worn condition where relevant | Force gauge/temperature logger/video or HIL harness; calibration before use | Indoor controlled bench; flight simulation only; representative misuse injected | Criterion above is proposed; numerical limits require qualified engineering/welfare review | Per described method; log every cycle/fault and state transition | Baseline function; monitor safety states; final containment/visual check | Stop on distress surrogate failure, unexpected motion, heat or interlock defeat; specialist authorizes restart | Sam Reed; independent specialist for hazardous tests | Included in $15000 feasibility allowance; internal target 2026-12-15 | Not ready — design/safety review first | Not run | No actual results | Not run; no pass or deviation claimed | No report exists | If fail: redesign Ventilation ribs and repeat linked tests | Not reviewed |
| Basic | TP-C1 | T03 | R03 / CTQ03 / DF03 | Verify Release slider before next gate | concept feasibility | Internal proposed method: Video-record unloaded representative-user task | Release grip keeps fingers 30 mm from door path; 10 adult users complete unloaded task without path contact; scenario C1 not approved | 10 mechanical prototypes or one simulated system across listed fault cases; screening sample, not certification | Basic C1; prototype uses surrogates and isolated rigs; no released hardware | Baseline clean/dry; repeat dirty/worn condition where relevant | Force gauge/temperature logger/video or HIL harness; calibration before use | Indoor controlled bench; flight simulation only; representative misuse injected | Criterion above is proposed; numerical limits require qualified engineering/welfare review | Per described method; log every cycle/fault and state transition | Baseline function; monitor safety states; final containment/visual check | Stop on distress surrogate failure, unexpected motion, heat or interlock defeat; specialist authorizes restart | Sam Reed; independent specialist for hazardous tests | Included in $15000 feasibility allowance; internal target 2026-12-15 | Not ready — design/safety review first | Not run | No actual results | Not run; no pass or deviation claimed | No report exists | If fail: redesign Release slider and repeat linked tests | Not reviewed |
| Basic | TP-C1 | T04 | R04 / CTQ04 / DF04 | Verify Washable shell before next gate | concept feasibility | Internal proposed method: Fluorescent soil inspection after hand wash; biological efficacy not claimed | Shell opens without tools; no visible fluorescent soil remains after defined wash on 10 units; scenario C1 not approved | 10 mechanical prototypes or one simulated system across listed fault cases; screening sample, not certification | Basic C1; prototype uses surrogates and isolated rigs; no released hardware | Baseline clean/dry; repeat dirty/worn condition where relevant | Force gauge/temperature logger/video or HIL harness; calibration before use | Indoor controlled bench; flight simulation only; representative misuse injected | Criterion above is proposed; numerical limits require qualified engineering/welfare review | Per described method; log every cycle/fault and state transition | Baseline function; monitor safety states; final containment/visual check | Stop on distress surrogate failure, unexpected motion, heat or interlock defeat; specialist authorizes restart | Sam Reed; independent specialist for hazardous tests | Included in $15000 feasibility allowance; internal target 2026-12-15 | Not ready — design/safety review first | Not run | No actual results | Not run; no pass or deviation claimed | No report exists | If fail: redesign Washable shell and repeat linked tests | Not reviewed |
| Basic | TP-C1 | T05 | R05 / CTQ05 / DF05 | Verify Bait pocket before next gate | concept feasibility | Internal proposed method: Force gauge pull and foreseeable misuse inspection | Bait insert remains captive after 20 N pull on 10 units; scenario C1 not approved | 10 mechanical prototypes or one simulated system across listed fault cases; screening sample, not certification | Basic C1; prototype uses surrogates and isolated rigs; no released hardware | Baseline clean/dry; repeat dirty/worn condition where relevant | Force gauge/temperature logger/video or HIL harness; calibration before use | Indoor controlled bench; flight simulation only; representative misuse injected | Criterion above is proposed; numerical limits require qualified engineering/welfare review | Per described method; log every cycle/fault and state transition | Baseline function; monitor safety states; final containment/visual check | Stop on distress surrogate failure, unexpected motion, heat or interlock defeat; specialist authorizes restart | Sam Reed; independent specialist for hazardous tests | Included in $15000 feasibility allowance; internal target 2026-12-15 | Not ready — design/safety review first | Not run | No actual results | Not run; no pass or deviation claimed | No report exists | If fail: redesign Bait pocket and repeat linked tests | Not reviewed |
| Basic | TP-C1 | T06 | R06 / CTQ06 / DF06 | Verify Occupancy inspection before next gate | concept feasibility | Internal proposed method: 10-user visibility/teach-back study; no live animals before ethical review | Instructions require frequent manual checks; user can see occupancy without opening; welfare reviewer sets actual interval before use; scenario C1 not approved | 10 mechanical prototypes or one simulated system across listed fault cases; screening sample, not certification | Basic C1; prototype uses surrogates and isolated rigs; no released hardware | Baseline clean/dry; repeat dirty/worn condition where relevant | Force gauge/temperature logger/video or HIL harness; calibration before use | Indoor controlled bench; flight simulation only; representative misuse injected | Criterion above is proposed; numerical limits require qualified engineering/welfare review | Per described method; log every cycle/fault and state transition | Baseline function; monitor safety states; final containment/visual check | Stop on distress surrogate failure, unexpected motion, heat or interlock defeat; specialist authorizes restart | Sam Reed; independent specialist for hazardous tests | Included in $15000 feasibility allowance; internal target 2026-12-15 | Not ready — design/safety review first | Not run | No actual results | Not run; no pass or deviation claimed | No report exists | If fail: redesign Occupancy inspection and repeat linked tests | Not reviewed |
Sample — fictitious company. All numbers and people are invented scenario assumptions. This is draft concept paperwork; no physical testing, customer evidence, certification, filing or sign-off has occurred.