| CTQ ID | Original concern or customer need | Raised by and source | Source revision or date | Linked requirement ID | Product or process characteristic | Proposed criticality and rationale | Acceptance limit and units | Limit source and revision | Owner | Status (proposed/unresolved/reviewed) | Linked FMEA IDs | Linked control plan IDs | Evidence file and revision | Next action | Due date | Reviewer and decision date |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| CTQ01 | Mouse escapes; repeated handling increases bite exposure | Sample design scenario; not customer evidence | 2026-10-24 | R01 | Capture door | Proposed functional; not formally approved | Door remains latched in 100 dry capture cycles on each of 10 concept units | Scenario requirement C1; proposed engineering target | Jordan Vale | proposed | DF01; PF01 | CP01 | Not tested; requirement and test plan C1 | Add positive over-center latch and keyed hinge pin | 2027-06-15 | Not reviewed — planned specialist review |
| CTQ02 | Confined mouse distress or death | Sample design scenario; not customer evidence | 2026-10-24 | R02 | Ventilation ribs | Proposed safety-critical | At least two independent raised vent paths remain unobstructed in bedding surrogate trial | Scenario requirement C1; proposed engineering target | Jordan Vale | proposed | DF02; PF02 | CP02 | Not tested; requirement and test plan C1 | Raise vents on opposing walls; add no-bedding instructions | 2027-06-15 | Not reviewed — planned specialist review |
| CTQ03 | Pinch or bite during release | Sample design scenario; not customer evidence | 2026-10-24 | R03 | Release slider | Proposed functional; not formally approved | Release grip keeps fingers 30 mm from door path; 10 adult users complete unloaded task without path contact | Scenario requirement C1; proposed engineering target | Jordan Vale | proposed | DF03; PF03 | CP03 | Not tested; requirement and test plan C1 | Extend external slider and add hold-open detent | 2027-06-15 | Not reviewed — planned specialist review |
| CTQ04 | User exposure to rodent waste | Sample design scenario; not customer evidence | 2026-10-24 | R04 | Washable shell | Proposed functional; not formally approved | Shell opens without tools; no visible fluorescent soil remains after defined wash on 10 units | Scenario requirement C1; proposed engineering target | Jordan Vale | proposed | DF04; PF04 | CP04 | Not tested; requirement and test plan C1 | Round internal corners; detach door cassette; hygiene instructions | 2027-06-15 | Not reviewed — planned specialist review |
| CTQ05 | Small-part ingestion by child or pet | Sample design scenario; not customer evidence | 2026-10-24 | R05 | Bait pocket | Proposed safety-critical | Bait insert remains captive after 20 N pull on 10 units | Scenario requirement C1; proposed engineering target | Jordan Vale | proposed | DF05; PF05 | CP05 | Not tested; requirement and test plan C1 | Integrate pocket into shell; no loose insert | 2027-06-15 | Not reviewed — planned specialist review |
| CTQ06 | Animal dehydration and distress | Sample design scenario; not customer evidence | 2026-10-24 | R06 | Occupancy inspection | Proposed safety-critical | Instructions require frequent manual checks; user can see occupancy without opening; welfare reviewer sets actual interval before use | Scenario requirement C1; proposed engineering target | Jordan Vale | proposed | DF06; PF06 | CP06 | Not tested; requirement and test plan C1 | Transparent inspection window; explicit do-not-leave-unattended warning | 2027-06-15 | Not reviewed — planned specialist review |
| CTQ07 | Escape or animal injury | Sample design scenario; not customer evidence | 2026-10-24 | R07 | Entry baffle | Proposed functional; not formally approved | Proposed 3-compartment target; rigid mouse surrogates cannot back-drive baffle at 2 N | Scenario requirement C1; proposed engineering target | Jordan Vale | proposed | DF07; PF07 | CP07 | Not tested; requirement and test plan C1 | Separate entry vestibule with anti-backdrive stop | 2027-06-15 | Not reviewed — planned specialist review |
| CTQ08 | User neglects occupied enclosure | Sample design scenario; not customer evidence | 2026-10-24 | R08 | Occupancy sensor | Proposed safety-critical | Detect surrogate in each chamber in 100 placements including dust challenge; zero false-empty permitted in concept screen | Scenario requirement C1; proposed engineering target | Jordan Vale | proposed | DF08; PF08 | CP08 | Not tested; requirement and test plan C1 | Use independent beam and weight checks; show uncertain as occupied | 2027-06-15 | Not reviewed — planned specialist review |
| CTQ09 | Delayed inspection harms captured animal | Sample design scenario; not customer evidence | 2026-10-24 | R09 | Wi-Fi alert queue | Proposed safety-critical | Local occupancy indicator works without network; app marks offline within proposed 5 minutes | Scenario requirement C1; proposed engineering target | Jordan Vale | proposed | DF09; PF09 | CP09 | Not tested; requirement and test plan C1 | Offline local indicator; queued alerts and no-cloud-needed manual checks | 2027-06-15 | Not reviewed — planned specialist review |
| CTQ10 | Unauthorized control and household occupancy disclosure | Sample design scenario; not customer evidence | 2026-10-24 | R10 | BLE provisioning | Proposed functional; not formally approved | Provisioning requires physical button; unique device identity; unauthorized client denied in 50 attempts | Scenario requirement C1; proposed engineering target | Jordan Vale | proposed | DF10; PF10 | CP10 | Not tested; requirement and test plan C1 | Authenticated pairing; expiring setup window; no shared password | 2027-06-15 | Not reviewed — planned specialist review |
| CTQ11 | Occupied trap appears inactive | Sample design scenario; not customer evidence | 2026-10-24 | R11 | Firmware updater | Proposed safety-critical | Local indication and mechanical capture remain safe after power interruption at each update phase | Scenario requirement C1; proposed engineering target | Jordan Vale | proposed | DF11; PF11 | CP11 | Not tested; requirement and test plan C1 | Signed dual-bank firmware with rollback and independent indicator | 2027-06-15 | Not reviewed — planned specialist review |
| CTQ12 | Burn or fire | Sample design scenario; not customer evidence | 2026-10-24 | R12 | Rechargeable pack | Proposed safety-critical | No charging in wet state; proposed independent overtemperature cutoff at 45 C cell surface pending battery engineer review | Scenario requirement C1; proposed engineering target | Jordan Vale | proposed | DF12; PF12 | CP12 | Not tested; requirement and test plan C1 | Protected replaceable pack; keyed certified-candidate charger; thermal cutoff | 2027-06-15 | Not reviewed — planned specialist review |
| CTQ13 | Shock from faulty adapter or overheating | Sample design scenario; not customer evidence | 2026-10-24 | R13 | Electronics cassette | Proposed safety-critical | Electronics detach before washing; power inhibited when cassette unseated | Scenario requirement C1; proposed engineering target | Jordan Vale | proposed | DF13; PF13 | CP13 | Not tested; requirement and test plan C1 | Separate dry cassette with keyed seal and wash label | 2027-06-15 | Not reviewed — planned specialist review |
| CTQ14 | Privacy loss after breach | Sample design scenario; not customer evidence | 2026-10-24 | R14 | Account and cloud | Proposed functional; not formally approved | Collect no precise location; proposed event retention 30 days with deletion request path | Scenario requirement C1; proposed engineering target | Jordan Vale | proposed | DF14; PF14 | CP14 | Not tested; requirement and test plan C1 | Local-first alerts; minimal pseudonymous event data; documented deletion | 2027-06-15 | Not reviewed — planned specialist review |
| CTQ15 | Blocked market access or interference | Sample design scenario; not customer evidence | 2026-10-24 | R15 | Radio module integration | Proposed safety-critical | Choose candidate module only after grant, antenna and host obligations reviewed; no FCC ID invented | Scenario requirement C1; proposed engineering target | Jordan Vale | proposed | DF15; PF15 | CP15 | Not tested; requirement and test plan C1 | Freeze antenna/layout; RF lab review before launch | 2027-06-15 | Not reviewed — planned specialist review |
| CTQ16 | Injury to trapped animals | Sample design scenario; not customer evidence | 2026-10-24 | R16 | Crowded chamber | Proposed safety-critical | Capacity is not rated; proposed three isolated chambers require welfare specialist approval | Scenario requirement C1; proposed engineering target | Jordan Vale | proposed | DF16; PF16 | CP16 | Not tested; requirement and test plan C1 | Independent compartments and ventilation; inhibit further entry if full | 2027-06-15 | Not reviewed — planned specialist review |
| CTQ17 | Crush/pinch injury | Sample design scenario; not customer evidence | 2026-10-24 | R17 | Wall-side deployment carriage | Proposed safety-critical | Deployment requires clear-zone sensing and local supervised enable; obstruction forces stop before contact in unloaded trials | Scenario requirement C1; proposed engineering target | Jordan Vale | proposed | DF17; PF17 | CP17 | Not tested; requirement and test plan C1 | Guard pinch points and torque-limit drive; positive travel stops | 2027-06-15 | Not reviewed — planned specialist review |
| CTQ18 | Impact injury and animal escape | Sample design scenario; not customer evidence | 2026-10-24 | R18 | Payload coupler | Proposed safety-critical | Two independent mechanical retention paths; release impossible until ground-contact confirmation | Scenario requirement C1; proposed engineering target | Jordan Vale | proposed | DF18; PF18 | CP18 | Not tested; requirement and test plan C1 | Captive redundant latch and diverse seated sensors | 2027-06-15 | Not reviewed — planned specialist review |
| CTQ19 | Laceration | Sample design scenario; not customer evidence | 2026-10-24 | R19 | Propeller guards | Proposed safety-critical | No rotor spin until guarded clearance zone verified; guarded ground fixture used first | Scenario requirement C1; proposed engineering target | Jordan Vale | proposed | DF19; PF19 | CP19 | Not tested; requirement and test plan C1 | Full guards; hardware arm inhibit; emergency motor stop | 2027-06-15 | Not reviewed — planned specialist review |
| CTQ20 | Collision or loss of live payload | Sample design scenario; not customer evidence | 2026-10-24 | R20 | Navigation estimator | Proposed safety-critical | Containment geofence independent of mission planner; abort on estimator disagreement | Scenario requirement C1; proposed engineering target | Jordan Vale | proposed | DF20; PF20 | CP20 | Not tested; requirement and test plan C1 | Independent supervisor; no public flight in sample phase | 2027-06-15 | Not reviewed — planned specialist review |
| CTQ21 | Crash and stranded animal | Sample design scenario; not customer evidence | 2026-10-24 | R21 | Mission battery | Proposed safety-critical | Return energy reserve proposed at least 40% under worst-case modeled payload and wind | Scenario requirement C1; proposed engineering target | Jordan Vale | proposed | DF21; PF21 | CP21 | Not tested; requirement and test plan C1 | Energy budget check before takeoff; abort to safe landing | 2027-06-15 | Not reviewed — planned specialist review |
| CTQ22 | Collision or unsafe release | Sample design scenario; not customer evidence | 2026-10-24 | R22 | Command link | Proposed safety-critical | Phone is not safety-critical; autonomous supervisor reaches predefined safe state on link loss | Scenario requirement C1; proposed engineering target | Jordan Vale | proposed | DF22; PF22 | CP22 | Not tested; requirement and test plan C1 | Independent flight controller and local abort plan | 2027-06-15 | Not reviewed — planned specialist review |
| CTQ23 | Falling animal and loss of containment | Sample design scenario; not customer evidence | 2026-10-24 | R23 | Field release door | Proposed safety-critical | Release permitted only when stationary on validated landing surface with motors stopped | Scenario requirement C1; proposed engineering target | Jordan Vale | proposed | DF23; PF23 | CP23 | Not tested; requirement and test plan C1 | Hardware ground/motor interlock plus software sequence checks | 2027-06-15 | Not reviewed — planned specialist review |
| CTQ24 | Animal harm, trespass or rule violation | Sample design scenario; not customer evidence | 2026-10-24 | R24 | Release destination | Proposed safety-critical | No field release until actual local species rules, landowner permission and welfare assessment recorded | Scenario requirement C1; proposed engineering target | Jordan Vale | proposed | DF24; PF24 | CP24 | Not tested; requirement and test plan C1 | Approved destination registry; human review before mission enable | 2027-06-15 | Not reviewed — planned specialist review |
| CTQ25 | Injury exposure and regulatory violation | Sample design scenario; not customer evidence | 2026-10-24 | R25 | Aircraft operation scope | Proposed safety-critical | No unattended outdoor launch; flight operations require qualified review of route, operator, airspace and permissions | Scenario requirement C1; proposed engineering target | Jordan Vale | proposed | DF25; PF25 | CP25 | Not tested; requirement and test plan C1 | Research-only simulation; human-supervised feasibility path with trained operator | 2027-06-15 | Not reviewed — planned specialist review |
| CTQ26 | Operation not ready for intended regime | Sample design scenario; not customer evidence | 2026-10-24 | R26 | Remote ID equipment | Proposed safety-critical | Remote ID and registration applicability resolved for exact aircraft before any outdoor flight | Scenario requirement C1; proposed engineering target | Jordan Vale | proposed | DF26; PF26 | CP26 | Not tested; requirement and test plan C1 | Qualified aircraft/Remote ID integration review; do not infer exemption | 2027-06-15 | Not reviewed — planned specialist review |
| CTQ27 | Thermal runaway/fire near wall | Sample design scenario; not customer evidence | 2026-10-24 | R27 | Charging dock contacts | Proposed safety-critical | Dual isolation and independent thermal protection; no charge after failed dock alignment | Scenario requirement C1; proposed engineering target | Jordan Vale | proposed | DF27; PF27 | CP27 | Not tested; requirement and test plan C1 | Enclosed contacts; current limiting and sensor disagreement shutdown | 2027-06-15 | Not reviewed — planned specialist review |
| CTQ28 | Loss of control and wet animal | Sample design scenario; not customer evidence | 2026-10-24 | R28 | Weather monitor | Proposed safety-critical | Research envelope proposed dry conditions and wind below 3 m/s; actual limits require flight validation | Scenario requirement C1; proposed engineering target | Jordan Vale | proposed | DF28; PF28 | CP28 | Not tested; requirement and test plan C1 | Local weather interlock; fail closed on missing/stale reading | 2027-06-15 | Not reviewed — planned specialist review |
| CTQ29 | Unsafe flight or household surveillance | Sample design scenario; not customer evidence | 2026-10-24 | R29 | Autonomy cybersecurity | Proposed safety-critical | Only authenticated signed mission plan; user cannot bypass safety envelope remotely | Scenario requirement C1; proposed engineering target | Jordan Vale | proposed | DF29; PF29 | CP29 | Not tested; requirement and test plan C1 | Secure boot; signed missions; least-privilege command channels | 2027-06-15 | Not reviewed — planned specialist review |
| CTQ30 | Rotor collision or trapped animal delay | Sample design scenario; not customer evidence | 2026-10-24 | R30 | Return docking | Proposed safety-critical | Maximum one failed docking attempt then designated safe land; no repeated wall approach | Scenario requirement C1; proposed engineering target | Jordan Vale | proposed | DF30; PF30 | CP30 | Not tested; requirement and test plan C1 | Independent dock fiducial check; keep-out zone and supervised abort | 2027-06-15 | Not reviewed — planned specialist review |
Sample — fictitious company. All numbers and people are invented scenario assumptions. This is draft concept paperwork; no physical testing, customer evidence, certification, filing or sign-off has occurred.